Legal Opinion

Buchko v. Board of Education of Connetquot Central School District No. 7

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Tasker, J.

Plaintiffs, taxpayers and voters residing in Central School District No. 7, Town of Islip, bring this tripartite action for declaratory judgments, an injunction and other relief. Defendant Board of Education moves to dismiss the three causes of action set forth in the complaint, pursuant to 3211 (subd. [a], pars. 2, 5, 7) Civil Practice Law and Buies. Plaintiffs cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to subdivision (c) of 3211 Civil Practice Law and Buies.

The first cause of action alleges that Central School District No. 7, formerly Consolidated Union Free School District No. 7, was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Cottrell v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gwynne v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Cottrell v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Cottrell v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duke & Benedict, Inc. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Schulz v. GalganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API