Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Gilliam

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 1952No. 4-9806PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This is a suit by a lawyer for his fee. Many extraneous matters have been brought into the record and the briefs, some going back as far as 1927; but we will attempt to present the contested issues in their simplest form.

Stevens and several other parties were interested in a judgment previously obtained against Martin. Stevens had a definite percentage interest in the judgment. Gilliam represented some of the other parties who had an interest in the judgment, and Stevens employed Gilliam to also represent him. Gilliam filed a proceeding in the Ouachita Chancery Court,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Federal Land Bk. of St. Louis v. GladishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Harger v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Murrell v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Seelbinder v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lester v. RoseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lester v. RoseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API