Legal Opinion

Creative Cabinet Corp. of America, Inc. v. Future Visions Computer Store

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff commenced the present action by the service of a summons and complaint in which "Future Visions Computer *484Store” was named as the sole defendant. The manner of service is not indicated in the record on appeal.

An answer was interposed by a party which did not identify itself, other than by the phrase "Defendant, sued herein as Future Visions Computer Store”. Among the defenses asserted in this answer were a "[d]enial of corporate existence and lack of capacity to contract, sue or be sued”, as well as a defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction. This answer also contained a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Connor v. FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Polizzano v. Gotham Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Kurz v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ober v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Hinds v. 2461 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Holster v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Fink v. Regent Hotel, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Smith v. Garo Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API