Legal Opinion

United States v. Hammock

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 13, 1957No. 9757PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*246Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

A special court-martial convicted the accused of a violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892, under a specification alleging the possession of ration cards made out to other airmen in contravention of the provisions of a regulation of Headquarters, United States Air Force in Europe. It adjudged a sentence which includes a bad-conduct discharge.

In United States v Tamas, 6 USCMA 502, 20 CMR 218, we held that, in the absence of allegation and proof of an intent to deceive, the possession of a false ration book is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. TamasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. BuckmillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. AlbericoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. CaveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. WeaverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. DozierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API