Legal Opinion · Dissent

McGowan v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002No. 71947-1Published

1DissentSanders, J.

(dissenting) — Although I agree with the majority that 1-732 requires the state to fully fund the cost-of-living increases for all school district employees, majority at 292,1 nevertheless would affirm the trial court’s order because this court’s order that the legislature fund its program is inconsistent with Hillis v. Department of Ecology, 131 Wn.2d 373, 932 P.2d 139 (1997). While overruling Hillis is wholly justified, consistency requires we follow it rigorously until and unless it is overruled.

The State argues even if it had a statutory duty to pay all district employees, this court has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API