Legal Opinion

Neff v. McKelvey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1938No. 26912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The sole question involved is whether two judges of the Court of Appeals may, over the objection of the appellant,'hear and determine an appeal on questions of law where one of the errors assigned is that the decision of the trial court (a jury having been waived) is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The journal entry of the Court of Appeals contains the following recitation: “This cause came on for hearing and appellant moved for a hearing before a full court and objected to proceeding with the hearing before the two judges present, and it appearing to the court that the two judges…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Frank, Admr. v. BayukSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
  4. Aultman v. UtseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Petroff-TachomakoffUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API