Bronstein v. Philadelphia Fair Housing Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
This action challenges the authority of the Philadelphia Fair Housing Commission (FHC) to enforce the city’s housing and fire code in a federally insured housing project by suspending rent increases that had been approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Plaintiffs Robert Bronstein and Welsh-Grant Developers (Welsh-Grant) are, respectively, manager and owner-mortgagor of Woodhaven Gardens, the project affected by the FHC order. The complaint prays for injunctive and declaratory relief and includes a somewhat nebulous claim…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Jaffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re NewlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Tower West Associates v. DerevnukCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982