Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Norfleet

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J. (after stating the facts).

Sec. 3772 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest confers a right of action on any candidate to contest the certification of vote as made by the county central committee, and provides that the action shall be brought in the circuit court within any county in the circuit or district wherein any of the wrongful acts occurred, if the contest is for a circuit or district office. It provides further that the complaint shall be supported by the affidavits of at- least ten reputable citizens, within a designated number of days.

This court has held that the filing of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faucette v. GerlachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Cornwell v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Yonkey v. State ex rel. CornelisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Logan v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Kirk v. HartliebSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Morrow v. StraitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Simes v. CrumblySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API