Legal Opinion
Lemman v. Foley
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 7, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00591Unknown
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 PETER LEMMAN, CASE NO. C20-0591-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 BENJAMIN PATRICK FOLEY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Peter Lemman’s motion to dismiss 16 Defendant Benjamin Foley’s amended counterclaims (Dkt. No. 30). Having thoroughly 17 considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument 18 unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES the motion in part for the 19 reasons…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.