Legal Opinion

Russell, Burdsall & Ward v. Excelsior Stove & Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams County; the Hon. Harry Higbee, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in assumpsit by appellant against appellee, to recover $1,014, the price of stove bolts sold and delivered in pursuance of a written contract, embodied in the following :

■ “ Quincy, III., December 14, 1898.

Bussell, Burdsall & Ward, Port Chester, FT. Y.

Gentlemen : Enter our order for our requirements in stove bolts from date to Jan. 1, 1901, not to exceed ten million bolts at a discount of 80-10-2-|- for bulk. Delivered í. o. b. cars Quincy, terms 60 days 2 off 10 days. Price guaranteed against decline and quality…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mount Hope Cemetery Ass'n v. WeidenmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Harber Bros. v. Moffat Cycle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons' Co. v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. George H. Hess Co. v. DawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weigel v. Powers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  2. T. W. Jenkins & Co. v. Anaheim Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  3. Chalmers & Williams v. Walter Bledsoe & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  4. McMichael v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Matot v. BarnheiselAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API