Legal Opinion
Seung Chun Lim v. City Of Long Beach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2000No. 98-55915PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
217 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2000)
SEUNG CHUN LIM; FLUFFY, INC., a California Corporation; 5436 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation, REHEARING AND Defendant-Appellee.
No. 98-55915
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted February 8, 2000--Pasadena, California
Filed June 27, 2000
Amended August 23, 2000
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Roger Jon Diamond, Santa Monica, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Daniel S. Murphy, City of Long Beach, Long Beach, California, for the defendant-appellee.
Jo…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Borough of Sayreville v. 35 CLUBNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010