St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. McClain
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by A’oll E. McClain against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced, by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below.
Hereafter the parties will be designated as '‘plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff, who was a railway mail clerk, alleged, in substance, that on a certain day the defendant negligently neglected to perform the duty imposed upon it by law by failing to furnish a mail car properly fitted up, furnished, warmed, and lighted for his use as a mail clerk in the service of the United States…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hewitt v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Schaff v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925