Legal Opinion

People v. Bordash

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1994No. Docket 163671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from her conviction based on her guilty plea to a charge of drawing a check over $200 without sufficient funds. MCL 750.131(3)(c); MSA 28.326(3)(c). She raises two issues on appeal. First, she claims ineffective assistance of counsel, because her court-appointed attorney advised her to unconditionally plead guilty, even though the prosecutor had already violated the 180-day rule in MCR 6.004(D)(1) (a). She also contends that she did not waive her right to a speedy trial. We affirm, but only for the reasons set forth below.

When reviewing a claim of ineffective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Oakland ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. IrwinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. NunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SwirlesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People of Michigan v. Timothy Wade HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People of Michigan v. Timothy Wade HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. BordashMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API