Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Snell
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1933No. 28474PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This is an action brought by a real estate broker to recover compensation for services. He obtained a judgment in the trial court, from which the defendant appeals.
The contract employing the plaintiff was oral, and since the employment was to assist in making an exchange of properties, recovery is not barred by section 36-108, Comp. St. 1929; Sallack v. Freeman, 106 Neb. 299; Gill v. Eagleton, 108 Neb. 179; Nelson v. Nelson, 95 Neb. 523.
The plaintiff produced a customer, negotiated a trade, and the defendant signed a contract of exchange, containing a time limitation for acceptance. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hubbs & Hastings Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Branch v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Gill v. EagletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Weisels-Gerhart Real Estate Co. v. EpsteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- George Clift Enters. v. Oshkosh Feedyard Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- The Nebraskans, Inc. v. HomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Peters v. DregerNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- McCully, Inc. v. Baccaro RanchNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Town & Country Realty of Kearney, Inc. v. GliddenNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.