Legal Opinion

Ignatow v. Ryan

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2001No. 1999-SC-0540-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to CR 76.36(7)(a), Appellant, Melvin Henry Ignatow, appeals as a matter of right from an order of the Court of Appeals denying his request for a writ of prohibition. Thereby, Appellant sought to prevent Judge Stephen P. Ryan from subjecting him to trial for perjury on grounds of collateral estoppel, as he had been previously acquitted of a murder charge arising from the same set of factual circumstances underlying the perjury charge. Appellant also sought to prevent his trial on the charge of being a second degree persistent felony offender. For the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Potter v. Eli Lilly and Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. HillebrandKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Benton v. CrittendenKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flynt v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matheney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Matheney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API