Legal Opinion

Flynt v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2003No. 2000-SC-0587-MR, 2000-SC-0399-TGPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. ISSUE

Because each of these two separate appeals presents an issue of first impression requiring us to interpret Kentucky’s Pretrial Diversion statutes, 1 we have elected to address them in a single opinion. In accordance with KRS 533.250(1), Kenton Circuit Court submitted for this Court’s approval a Class D Felony Pretrial Diversion Program, which we approved. Because KRS 533.250(2) provides that “[t]he Commonwealth’s attorney shall make a recommendation upon each application for pretrial diversion to the Circuit Judge in the court where the case would be tried,” 2 Part…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. St. Clair v. RoarkKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bradshaw v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. ReyesKentucky Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Caneyville Volunteer Fire Department v. Green's Motorcycle Salvage, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bartley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hodge v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API