Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2003No. 25180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Michael Gray (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 Movant contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to interview or depose a witness at the scene of the shooting who allegedly heard a victim threaten Movant. Movant now claims that he would not have pled guilty if his trial counsel had obtained this evidence, but instead would have pled self-defense and insisted on proceeding to a trial. We affirm.

Movant was charged by information in the Circuit Court of New Madrid County with three counts of assault…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Peiffer v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Smulls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Butts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tabor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Megan L. Hendricks, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API