Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Arnot

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1907No. Civ. No. 369PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The court below sustained a general demurrer to the complaint and thereupon caused judgment to be entered in favor of the defendant.

Plaintiff appeals from said judgment.

The complaint alleges that for a long time prior to and on and for some months after the sixth day of June, 1904, the defendant was a duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the superior court of the, state of California, in and for- the county of Alpine; that on said sixth day of June, 1904, the appellant as plaintiff commenced a civil action in said superior court against one Thomas Barber by “filing a complaint in due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yates v. LansingNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  2. Weaver v. DevendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Turpen v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Downer v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. The PatapscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nunn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Baar v. TigermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Watson v. MerialdoNevada Supreme Court · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API