Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Herbert

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1988No. C-4986Published

1Opinion of the Court

754 S.W.2d 141 (1988)

Hansel Kay HERBERT, Petitioner,

v.

Dorothy HERBERT, Respondent.

No. C-4986.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 25, 1988.

Gayle E. Oler, Dallas, for petitioner.

Raymond D. Noah and Brenda B. Herrera, Raymond D. Noah & Associates, Richardson, Robert E. Hager and Roy L. Armstrong, Sallinger, Nichols, Jackson, Kirk & Dillard, Dallas, for respondent.

KILGARLIN, Justice.

Once more we confront the tension between the constitutionally guaranteed right of trial by jury and the constitutionally bestowed grant to courts of appeals that their decisions shall be conclusive on questions of fact.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Culver; Dissent · Mauzy; Dissent · Robertson.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API