UNITED FOOD AND COMMER. WORKERS UNIONS AND FOOD EMPLOYEES BENEFIT FUND v. DeBuono
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Food Employees Benefit Fund (“Fund”), argues that New York’s surcharge system under the Health Care Reform Act (“HCRA”) violates the Commerce and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution and is actionable pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Fund is headquartered in Cypress, California and is an “employee benefit plan” as that term is defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1). {See Thompson Aff. at ¶ 2.)
Plaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tully v. Griffin, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- San Juan Cellular Telephone Company, Etc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.