Legal Opinion
Continental Can Co. v. Hudson Foam
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 23, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
123 N.J. Super. 364 (1973)
303 A.2d 97
CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, A CORPORATION, HORN HARDART COMPANY, A CORPORATION, NEW YORK SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HUDSON FOAM LATEX PRODUCTS, INC., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 23, 1973.
Messrs. Feuerstein, Sachs & Maitlin, attorneys for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Vaccaro and Osborne, attorneys for defendant.
BRESLIN, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.
This is a motion for summary judgment by three corporate plaintiffs (Continental Can Company, Horn Hardart Company and New York Susquehanna and Western…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Berner v. British Commonwealth Pacific Airlines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Mazzilli v. ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INS. CO., ETC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Estate of EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Foltz v. Pullman, IncorporatedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Continental Can Co. v. Hudson Foam Latex Prod., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Smith v. EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Iskander v. Columbia Cement Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.