Legal Opinion
Foltz v. Pullman, Incorporated
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided April 15, 1974PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTIE, Judge.
This is a wrongful death action arising out of the death of the plaintiff’s husband. The defendants are Pullman, Inc., and the Carborundum Company. 1 Plaintiff alleges that defendants are responsible for the design, production, and installation of a new type of furnace system at the Phoenix Steel Corporation plant in Claymont, Delaware, where the decedent was employed. It is plaintiff’s contention that the defendants’ negligence in connection with the new furnace system caused the system to adversely affect the environmental conditions at the plant and that her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
- Tyndall v. TyndallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Continental Can Co. v. Hudson FoamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- General Motors Corporation v. MorganSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- LaPoint v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- In Re Estate of EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. Playtex FP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Messick v. Star EnterpriseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.