Legal Opinion

Drafts v. Shull Sausage Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 18, 1981No. 21394PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Shull Sausage Company, Inc., appeals from an order granting summary judgment to respondent General American Life Insurance Company. We affirm.

In deciding whether summary judgment was properly granted, we must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to appellant. Summary judgment should be granted only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Jamison v. Howard, 271 S. C. 385, 247 S. E. (2d) 450 (1978).

J. Harvey Drafts owned a twenty per cent interest in Shull Sausage Company and contracted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Jamison v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Reynolds ex rel. Estate of Arant v. Wabash Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huckaby v. Confederate Motor Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Horry County v. Insurance Reserve FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API