Legal Opinion

Succession of Neuhauser

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 6, 1991No. 90-C-1342PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

579 So.2d 437 (1991)

SUCCESSION OF Clare Fogarty NEUHAUSER.

No. 90-C-1342.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 1991.

Andrew M. Edwards, II, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read, Hammond & Mintz, Gordon P. Serou, Jr., and John H. Ryan, Ryan & Willeford, New Orleans, for applicant.

Alan B. Tusa, New Orleans, Brian D. Zeringer, Gretna, for David A. Neuhauser, Jr., Respondent.

DENNIS, Justice.

In this case a creditor seeks to reopen a succession in order to have a debtor's renunciation of a legacy revoked so that the creditor may accept the legacy in the debtor's stead. After a trial-type hearing, the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Succession of NeuhauserLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Succession of NeuhauserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Traina v. Whitney National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Opelousas Prod. Credit v. BB & H.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. In Re LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Thomas Laughlin v. Nouveau Body and Tan, LLC, et aCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Murray v. Stacy Trust (In Re Goldberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API