Legal Opinion

State v. Eustace

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 14, 1989No. 23062Published

1Per curiam

Appellants were convicted of night hunting as defined in S. C. Code Ann. § 50-11-20 (1976 and Supp. 1987).1 We affirm.

Appellants assert that the trial court’s failure to charge the jury on spotlighting as a lesser included offense of night hunting constituted error. We disagree.

The test to determine if a crime is a lesser included offense of the crime charged is whether the greater offense includes all of the elements of the lesser offense. State v. Ritter, 296 S. C. 51, 370 S. E. (2d) 610 (1988); State v. Suttles, 279 S. C. 87, 302 S. E. (2d) 338 (1983).

Section 50-11-20 provides, in part:

Ther…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SuttlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. RitterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API