Legal Opinion

State v. Suttles

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 19, 1983No. 21902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice.

Appellants were indicted for burglary and pleaded guilty to housebreaking. They now contend housebreaking is not a lesser included offense of burglary, and thus they pleaded guilty to an offense for which they were neither indicted nor waived presentment. See Summerall v. State, S. C., 294 S. E. (2d) 344 (1982) and State v. Martin, S. C., 294 S. E. (2d) 345 (1982). We disagree and affirm.

The test for determining when a crime is a lesser included offense of the crime charged is whether the greater of the two offenses includes all the elements of the lesser offense. State v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Summerall v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. SprouseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. WalshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API