Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Rochester Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1959No. Appeals, 49 and 50PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Adams Street, a 40-foot wide thoroughfare in Rochester, accomplishes the unique feat, at the point involved in this litigation, of running upgrade and downgrade at the same time. This paradox is explained by tbe fact that a strip 12 foot wide on the northern sides rises, by means of a ramp, to another; thoroughfare called Rome Avenue, while the' rest of the street proceeds downhill to ah intersecting highway known as New Hampshire Avenue. The ■ ramp, . which lifts Adams Street to the elevation'necessary to carry it to Rome Avenue, is supported by a concrete…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decker v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Drew v. LaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Starr v. VenezianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Carletti v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Balsamo v. Hoover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1987
  5. Drew v. LaberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API