Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Hermitage Realty

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 4, 1987No. Record 840522PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.

The sole issue framed on this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the findings of a jury that the defendants had induced the plaintiffs to enter into a contract of sale by misrepresenting an existing fact. We conclude that the trial court erred in setting the verdicts aside.

The Yeonas Company developed Stonewall Manor, a condominium project, in several successive stages. As each section was completed, Yeonas furnished one of the units as an office for the use of its exclusive real estate agent, Hermitage Realty. A map, a copy of the original plan of development approved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Colonial Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Wilson v. Carpenter's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Lloyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  5. George Robberecht Seafood, Inc. v. Maitland Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Fox v. DeeseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Abi-Najm v. Concord Condominium, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  4. Enomoto v. Space Adventures, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  5. Elliott v. Shore Stop, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API