Legal Opinion · Dissent

Raymond v. Feldmann

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 17, 1993No. 89-CV-0372-ST; CA A67087Published

1DissentDe Muniz, J.

On reconsideration, I would conclude that the trial court did not err in awarding defendant attorney fees as consequential damages. Accordingly, I dissent.

Defendant alleged the release agreement as both an affirmative defense to plaintiffs action and as a counterclaim. After finding that the agreement was valid, the trial court *550awarded, as consequential damages for breach of the release agreement, the amount of defendant’s attorney fees for preparing and defending the personal injury action.1 Plaintiff does not contest the trial court’s finding that she breached her agreement by suing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Senior Estates, Inc. v. Bauman Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Raymond v. FeldmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Braught v. GranasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API