Legal Opinion

Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1957No. 15745_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

This case is before us for the second time. Appellant, his brother, Arthur Earl Bistram, and another were indicted for the crime of kidnapping as defined by Section 1201(a), Title 18, U.S.C. Each of the defendants entered a plea of guilty. Thereafter Carl Harvey Bis-tram, appellant herein, filed a motion to vacate and set aside the judgment- on the ground that the sentencing court lacked jurisdiction in that the indictment failed to negative an exception contained in Section 1201(a), Title 18, U.S.C. This motion the trial court overruled and appellant again filed a motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. John Reid v. Phillip Charney and Howard LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States of America, Carl Harvey Bistram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Victor Harry Feguer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Carl Harvey Bistram and Arthur Earl Bistram v. People of the State of Minnesota, County of HennepinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Carl Harvey Bistram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. GeiseDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API