Carl Harvey Bistram and Arthur Earl Bistram v. People of the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.
Two brothers, Carl Harvey Bistram and Arthur Earl Bistram, appeal in forma pauperis from an order of the district court denying their joint motion for relief, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), with respect to an indictment returned by a Hennepin County, Minnesota, grand jury in June 1949. The indictment charged the Bistrams and two others with murder in the first degree committed five days earlier. The essence of their motion is that, with the lapse of almost 15 years since the indictment issued, they have been deprived of their Sixth Amendment rights to a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Frankel v. WoodroughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. ChaseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Commonwealth v. HanleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert James Pitts v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Lawrence v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Commonwealth v. McGrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- United States v. Berry BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.