Legal Opinion
Continental Art Co. v. Bertolozzi
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 19, 1956No. 11524PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought for the infringement of Design Letters Patent No. 168,682, granted to plaintiff on January 27, 1953, on a design for a figurine as shown in the patent. The defendant pleaded as a defense invalidity and non-infringement. The district court, after making findings of fact and entering conclusions of law, on June 28, 1955 rendered its judgment holding the patent invalid but if valid not infringed, and that defendant was entitled to recover of the plaintiff reasonable attorney fees, reserving jurisdiction for the assessment of such fees. From this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Philco Corporation and Radio Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Richard E. Landau, Cross-Appellee v. J. D. Barter Construction Company, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.