Legal Opinion
Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 17, 2020No. 11-201Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 11-201C Filed: November 2, 2020 Refiled: November 17, 2020 ROSS-HIME DESIGNS, INC., Keywords: Patent; Non- Infringement; RCFC 56; Mas- Plaintiff, Hamilton Grp. v. LaGard, Inc.,
156 F.3d 1206
(Fed. Cir. v. 1998); Celotex Corp. v. THE UNITED STATES, Catrett,
477 U.S. 317
(1986); Doctrine of Equivalents; Defendant. Anticipation; 35 U.S.C. § 112. Vytas M. Rimas, Rimas Law Firm, PLLC, Minnetonka, MN, for Plaintiff. Conrad J. DeWitte, Jr., Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.