Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. First National Life Insurance Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1968No. 8544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.'

CARMODY, Justice.

We are here concerned with the liability of the defendant insurance company for the value of a policy, never written, but for which application was made and receipt issued for the initial first month’s premium. The trial court determined the policy should have issued, that the company was estopped to deny coverage, and that the failure to return the premium constituted'waiver of any claim of forfeiture.

Although the case was tried and briefed upon the basis, principally, of fraud and material misrepresentation in the application for insurance, we do not consider that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Vargas v. Pacific National Life Assurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hughes v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Silva v. Sentinel Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Reese v. American National Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Tripp v. the Reliable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Kimmel v. WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF OHIODistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  4. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. Tripp v. the Reliable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API