Legal Opinion

Tustin v. Faught

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action to recover possession of a tract of land in Sonoma County—a portion of the Rancho “ Laguna de San Antonio.” Both parties claim title under Bartolomé Bojorques, the grantee of the Mexican Government. The Court rendered a judgment against all the defendants except Gaston, from which, and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial* they appeal.

The plaintiff, to maintain the action, introduced in evidence a deed of conveyance, dated December 8th, 1855, executed by Bar*239tolome Bojorques and eleven others. The defendants made several objections to this deed, one of which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. KinzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Moore v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Landers v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Schuyler v. BroughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Salmon v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API