Claim of Valentine v. Sherwood Metal Working Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Sherwood Metal Working Company and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the Syracuse office of said Commission on the 27th day of May, 1919.
1Per curiam
There is no dispute as to the facts in this case. The claimant was employed at Syracuse by the Sherwood Metal Working Company as a riveter upon shovels. A small portion of steel was picked up by the rapid hammer used and lodged in the back of the eye-ball, defying all efforts at its removal. The State Industrial Commission has found that “ said injury resulted in the loss of the left eye,” but there is no evidence to support this finding, for the entire testimony is to the effect that the eye, with the aid of a proper glass, is nearly normal for many purposes. That there is an injury, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claim of Frings v. Pierce Arrow Motor Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- American Zinc Co. v. LuskTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Claim of McNamara v. McHarg, Barton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.