Legal Opinion
Su Humble v. Boeing Company, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2002No. 01-35107PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Su Humble appeals the district court’s dismissal of her Washington state law claims on the grounds that they were preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), and that the six month statute of limitations for filing an action under the LMRA had expired. Because we find that Humble’s state law reasonable accommodation claim is not preempted, we reverse.
I. Background
Su Humble is a Korean woman who was employed as a fabrication bench mechanic at Boeing in February 1999 when she suffered an on-the-job injury to her shoulder. According…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jesse Acosta-Huerta v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Men's ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Menotti v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- David Valles John Breslin, and Members of the General Public Similarly Situated v. Ivy Hill CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.