Pro-Choice Network of Western New York v. Project Rescue Western New York
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ARCARA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint and vacate the Court’s February 14, 1992 preliminary injunction. The basis for defendants’ motion is that dismissal of the federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is compelled by the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993), and without the federal claim, the Court is precluded from exercising pendent jurisdiction 1 over the remaining state-law claims,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Horizon Health Center v. FelicissimoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pro-Choice Network v. SchenckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Pro-Choice Network of Western New York v. SchenckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.