Legal Opinion
Territory of Hawaii v. Kaholokula
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1947No. 2657PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
PETERS, J.'
This is an indictment for riot and unlawful assembly. Appellants filed a demurrer or motion to quash. It was overruled and the ruling is here for review upon an interlocutory bill of exceptions.
The grounds of the demurrer or motion to quash challenging the sufficiency of the indictment are both general and special. Under the general ground “That the indictment and each count thereof fails to charge the defendants or any of them, with the "commission of any crime,” appellants argue (a) that neither the riotous acts described in the indictment nor industrial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. AckermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1949
- Shenfield v. City Court of City of Tucson, Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Ackerman v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Ackerman, Atty. Gen. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union Bevins, County Atty. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union (Two Cases). Ackerman, Atty. Gen. v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951