Duca v. Raymark Industries
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PER CURIAM * .
In June of 1985, a group of asbestos producers and insurers signed an agreement the purpose of which was “to provide for the administration, defense, payment and disposition of asbestos-related claims.” That agreement, which is known as the Wellington Agreement, created an organization called the Asbestos Claims Facility (“the Facility”). As part of its provision for the defense of its members in the courts, the Facility has adopted the practice of selecting one or more law firms to represent its members in litigation in each city, and of further selecting a single firm…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griva v. DavisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Commonwealth Insurance v. Graphix Hot Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gabianelli v. AzarAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Gemini Lake v. Edward Brennan, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026