Legal Opinion

Gabianelli v. Azar

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1989No. S-3024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINO WITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether the superior court erred in disqualifying an attorney from further participation in a case under Alaska Code of Professional Responsibility Canon 9 (1988). The superi- or court ruled that the attorney’s former personal relationship with the opposing party’s accountant created an appearance of impropriety and disqualified the attorney. We reverse for the reasons set forth below.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

According to the allegations in the complaint, this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Russell HobsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Board of Education v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Alexander v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tera Bunton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen A. Lingley v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. and Dan KaneAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API