Legal Opinion
Payne v. Mundaca Investment Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1990No. 72A01-9007-CV-284PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
Orville Payne (Payne) appeals from partial summary judgment entered against his assertion of certain affirmative defenses and also from judgment of foreclosure based upon his promissory note, which had been assigned to Mundaca Investment Corporation (Mundaca). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Mundaca filed a complaint on a promissory note and requested foreclosure based upon its allegation that Payne had executed and delivered the note to Scott County-Canco Federal Credit Union (Caneo) in the amount of $50,000.00, with a 18% annual interest rate. Payne had secured the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Carrell v. EllingwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schuyler National Bank v. GadsdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haberl v. BigelowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- City of Crawfordsville v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jackson v. Luellen Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. SkotzkeDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- Davion Peterson v. Sandra OwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.