Legal Opinion

Mirkowicz v. Reading Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 3, 1936No. 6018PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

Appellant was a member of a regular crew of brakemen in the employ of the railroad company, appellee. He was injured through the charged negligence of his employer. He brought his action in the United States District Court under the Acts of Congress which gave in certain cases a cause of action to injured railroad employees. At the trial judgment of nonsuit was entered against him on the sole ground that he had offered no evidence from which it could be found that he was at the time he was injured, in the language of these acts, employed in interstate commerce. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newark Morning Ledger Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Francis C. O'Neill and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States v. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation, Third-Party Francis C. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. In Re School Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. Reading Co. v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API