Legal Opinion

Reading Co. v. Larkin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 17, 1940No. 7188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Larkin, an employee of the defendant company, instituted suit for damages in the court below under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of his employer, an interstate carrier. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff whereon the court below entered judgment; and, from that judgment, the defendant took the present appeal. The appellant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was not sufficient to sustain the finding, implied by the jury’s verdict, that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Coll v. Easton Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Theodore Kornicki v. Calmar Steamship Corporation v. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API