Legal Opinion

Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided August 16, 2010No. File 1:08-CV-197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE (Papers 45, 48, and 52)

J. GARVAN MURTHA, Senior District Judge.

This is a patent infringement case dealing with studded rubber overshoes. Plaintiff Chet’s Shoes, Inc. (“Chet’s Shoes”) requests an injunction and declaratory judgment that its products do not infringe two patents held by defendant Sidney Kastner (“Kastner”). Kastner, in turn, counterclaims for patent infringement. The case is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment (Papers 45 and 49),…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of St. Albans v. Hayford - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2021
  2. lamothe-farwell v. community health centersVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API