Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouck, J.

This is a proceeding in error which comes into this court from the court of common pleas of Franklin county. The plaintiff, who was in the employ of the city of Columbus, was injured in an automobile accident and made application to the Industrial Commission for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Section 1465-37, et seq., General Code). His application for allow anee of compensation was refused for the reason that the claimant’s injury was not sustained in the course of, or did not arise out of, his employment. To this finding of the Industrial Commission an appeal was taken…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Nagy v. KangesserOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Livers v. Graham Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. McKibben v. StuhlbargOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API