Nagy v. Kangesser
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
This cause is here on error proceedings from the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county, wherein that court, at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff, Julia Nagy, sustained a motion on behalf of defendant for a directed verdict, on the theory that the doctrine of respondeat superior did not apply, under the undisputed facts in the record as they appeared at the time the motion was made and sustained.
The only question here to determine is whether this action of the court, upon which judgment for defendant was entered, is founded in error. From the facts in the record, it appears that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nussbaum v. Traung Label & Lithograph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- McKenzie v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Gilmore v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Smith v. Brown-Service Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Bourus v. HagenWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Pesot v. YandaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- P. F. Collier & Son Distributing Corp. v. DrinkwaterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.