Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Harman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1987No. 86-1337-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

The referee recommended that Attorney Donald J. Harman be publicly reprimanded for failing to turn over a client’s file to successor counsel in a divorce matter, notwithstanding a court order to do so, and for charging another client an excessive fee. The referee also recommended that Attorney Harman be ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding- and to pay restitution to each of the clients for losses they incurred as a result of his misconduct. While we determine that a public reprimand is an appropriate disciplinary response…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HarmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HarmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Fadner IIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API