In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Harman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.
The referee recommended that Attorney Donald J. Harman be publicly reprimanded for failing to turn over a client’s file to successor counsel in a divorce matter, notwithstanding a court order to do so, and for charging another client an excessive fee. The referee also recommended that Attorney Harman be ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding- and to pay restitution to each of the clients for losses they incurred as a result of his misconduct. While we determine that a public reprimand is an appropriate disciplinary response…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gerald P. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HarmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HarmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against Fadner IIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.