Kansas City Hotel Co. v. Sigement
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Kansas City Court of Common Pleas. I. The petition contains but one count in which are commingled four separate and distinct causes of action. (Kansas City Hotel Co. vs. Harris, 51 Mo., 464.) II.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Kansas City Court of Common Pleas. I. The petition contains but one count in which are commingled four separate and distinct causes of action. (Kansas City Hotel Co. vs. Harris, 51 Mo., 464.) II. The finding and judgment are both a part of the record, and, even had there been no motion in arrest, a single finding of one entire gross sum, where there are several causes of action stated in the petition, would be bad on appeal, or writ of error; as it would be an error apparent of record. (Bateson vs. Clark, 37 Mo., 31; State vs. Matson, 38 Mo., 489; Hoppe vs. Stone, 39 Mo., 378.) I.…
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge
The defendant subscribed ten shares to the capital stock of plaintiff, which amounted to one thousand dollars ; each share being one hundred dolíais. The subscriptions to the stock were to he paid on calls to he made by the board of directors-*177The first call was ten per centum, which was paid by the defendant. The board of directors afterward made four more calls, as follows:
2nd. Call of ten per cent, made May 4, 1868, payable on or before May 15, 1868.
3rd. Call of ten per cent, made June 8, 1868, payable on or before June 16, 1868.
4th. Call of fifty per cent, made December 15, 1868, payable…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newton v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Commissioners of Barton County v. PlumbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Peters v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Bacon v. PerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Rogers v. YoderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.