Legal Opinion

Peters v. Meyer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1936No. 29769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chappell, District Judge.

This is a law action to recover the principal and interest thereon after maturity of a $1,500 promissory note or negotiable bond, dated May 18, 1927, maturing June 1, 1932. The interest accruing before maturity is represented by ten interest coupons payable semiannually upon which no recovery is sought in this action. Defendant, appellant, filed answer to petition of plaintiff, appellee, in which, for his first defense, he denied generally the allegations therein except that he signed the note and that plaintiff was *848assignee thereof as alleged. For a second defense he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Nathans v. . HopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Dulaney v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. French v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Beck v. DevereauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suhr v. City of ScribnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bruno v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gaspar v. FlottNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. First National Bank of Hollywood v. FreedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Bruno v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API